Menu Top
Complete Course of Mathematics
Topic 1: Numbers & Numerical Applications Topic 2: Algebra Topic 3: Quantitative Aptitude
Topic 4: Geometry Topic 5: Construction Topic 6: Coordinate Geometry
Topic 7: Mensuration Topic 8: Trigonometry Topic 9: Sets, Relations & Functions
Topic 10: Calculus Topic 11: Mathematical Reasoning Topic 12: Vectors & Three-Dimensional Geometry
Topic 13: Linear Programming Topic 14: Index Numbers & Time-Based Data Topic 15: Financial Mathematics
Topic 16: Statistics & Probability


Content On This Page
Concept of a Limit: Definition and Understanding Left Hand Limit and Right Hand Limit: Definition and Significance Existence of a Limit
Evaluation of Limits by Direct Substitution Methods for Evaluating Indeterminate Forms (Factorization, Rationalization)


Limits: Introduction and Evaluation Techniques



Concept of a Limit: Definition and Understanding

The concept of a limit is one of the most fundamental building blocks of calculus and mathematical analysis. It provides a way to describe the behavior of a function as the input variable approaches a certain value, without necessarily being equal to that value. Understanding limits is essential for grasping concepts like continuity, derivatives, and integrals.

Intuitive Understanding

Informally, the limit of a function $f(x)$ as $x$ approaches a specific value $a$ is the value that $f(x)$ gets arbitrarily close to as $x$ gets arbitrarily close to $a$, from either side, but without actually reaching $a$. We are interested in the function's behavior *near* the point, not necessarily *at* the point.

Think of it as asking: "If we take input values ($x$) closer and closer to $a$, what output value ($f(x)$) does the function seem to be aiming for?"

Consider the function $f(x) = \frac{x^2 - 1}{x - 1}$. If we try to evaluate $f(x)$ at $x=1$, we get $\frac{1^2 - 1}{1 - 1} = \frac{0}{0}$, which is an indeterminate form, meaning the function is undefined at $x=1$. However, let's see what happens as $x$ gets very close to 1.

For any value of $x$ other than 1 (i.e., $x \neq 1$), we can simplify the function algebraically:

$f(x) = \frac{x^2 - 1}{x - 1} = \frac{(x-1)(x+1)}{x-1}$

Since $x \neq 1$, the term $(x-1)$ is non-zero, allowing us to cancel it from the numerator and denominator:

$f(x) = x+1 \quad \text{for } x \neq 1$.

Now, let's pick values of $x$ that are increasingly close to 1, but not equal to 1:

$x$ (approaching 1 from left) $f(x) = x+1$ $x$ (approaching 1 from right) $f(x) = x+1$
0.90.9 + 1 = 1.9 1.11.1 + 1 = 2.1
0.990.99 + 1 = 1.99 1.011.01 + 1 = 2.01
0.9990.999 + 1 = 1.999 1.0011.001 + 1 = 2.001
...... ......
Approaching 1Approaching 2 Approaching 1Approaching 2

As the table shows, regardless of whether $x$ approaches 1 from values less than 1 or values greater than 1, the corresponding values of $f(x)$ get closer and closer to 2. Even though $f(1)$ is undefined, the function is clearly heading towards the value 2.

Graph of f(x) = (x^2-1)/(x-1)

Graphically, the function $f(x) = \frac{x^2-1}{x-1}$ for $x \neq 1$ is the same as the line $y = x+1$ but with a 'hole' at the point $(1, 2)$. The limit describes the height of the graph at that hole.


Notation

We denote the limit of the function $f(x)$ as $x$ approaches $a$ is $L$ using the following notation:

$\lim\limits_{x \to a} f(x) = L$

This is read as "the limit of $f(x)$ as $x$ approaches $a$ equals $L$." The arrow $x \to a$ signifies that $x$ is getting arbitrarily close to $a$, and the equality $\dots = L$ signifies that the corresponding function value $f(x)$ is getting arbitrarily close to $L$. It's important to remember that the limit is about the behavior *near* $a$, not necessarily *at* $a$.


Formal Definition (Epsilon-Delta Definition)

To provide a rigorous, unambiguous definition of a limit, mathematicians use the epsilon-delta definition. This definition precisely captures the intuitive idea that $f(x)$ can be made arbitrarily close to $L$ by taking $x$ sufficiently close to $a$ (but not equal to $a$).

We say that the limit of $f(x)$ as $x$ approaches $a$ is $L$, written as $\lim\limits_{x \to a} f(x) = L$, if for every real number $\epsilon > 0$ (epsilon, representing a desired closeness to $L$), there exists a corresponding real number $\delta > 0$ (delta, representing a required closeness to $a$) such that for all $x$ in the domain of $f$, if the distance between $x$ and $a$ is positive but less than $\delta$, i.e., $0 < |x - a| < \delta$, then the distance between $f(x)$ and $L$ is less than $\epsilon$, i.e., $|f(x) - L| < \epsilon$.

In simpler terms:

So, no matter how small you make the tolerance $\epsilon$ around $L$, you must be able to find a corresponding tolerance $\delta$ around $a$ such that any $x$ (not equal to $a$) within $\delta$ of $a$ maps to an $f(x)$ within $\epsilon$ of $L$. This formalizes the notion of "arbitrarily close." Proving limits using the epsilon-delta definition is a rigorous exercise often covered in introductory analysis courses.



Left Hand Limit and Right Hand Limit: Definition and Significance

When examining the behavior of a function $f(x)$ as $x$ approaches a point $a$, the approach can be made from two directions: from values less than $a$ or from values greater than $a$. The limits from these two directions are called the Left Hand Limit and the Right Hand Limit, respectively. These one-sided limits are crucial for determining the existence of the overall limit and for understanding the continuity of a function.

Left Hand Limit (LHL)

The Left Hand Limit of a function $f(x)$ as $x$ approaches $a$ is the value that $f(x)$ approaches as $x$ gets arbitrarily close to $a$ from values that are less than $a$. We are considering the behavior of the function to the immediate left of $a$ on the x-axis.

Notation: The left hand limit is commonly denoted by adding a superscript minus sign to the value $a$ in the limit notation:

$\lim\limits_{x \to a^-} f(x)$

Other notations sometimes encountered include $\lim\limits_{x \uparrow a} f(x)$ or $f(a-)$ or $f(a-0)$. The superscript minus sign indicates that $x$ approaches $a$ from the left side (i.e., $x < a$).

When evaluating a left hand limit, we consider a sequence of $x$ values like $a - 0.1, a - 0.01, a - 0.001, \dots$, approaching $a$ from smaller values.


Right Hand Limit (RHL)

The Right Hand Limit of a function $f(x)$ as $x$ approaches $a$ is the value that $f(x)$ approaches as $x$ gets arbitrarily close to $a$ from values that are greater than $a$. We are considering the behavior of the function to the immediate right of $a$ on the x-axis.

Notation: The right hand limit is commonly denoted by adding a superscript plus sign to the value $a$ in the limit notation:

$\lim\limits_{x \to a^+} f(x)$

Other notations sometimes encountered include $\lim\limits_{x \downarrow a} f(x)$ or $f(a+)$ or $f(a+0)$. The superscript plus sign indicates that $x$ approaches $a$ from the right side (i.e., $x > a$).

When evaluating a right hand limit, we consider a sequence of $x$ values like $a + 0.1, a + 0.01, a + 0.001, \dots$, approaching $a$ from larger values.


Significance of One-Sided Limits

Left hand and right hand limits are fundamental tools in calculus and have significant importance for several reasons:


Example 1. Consider the piecewise function: $f(x) = \begin{cases} x + 1 & , & x < 2 \\ x^2 - 1 & , & x \ge 2 \end{cases}$ Find the left hand limit and right hand limit as $x$ approaches 2. Based on the one-sided limits, does $\lim\limits_{x \to 2} f(x)$ exist?

Answer:

We need to evaluate the limit of $f(x)$ as $x$ approaches 2. Since the function is defined differently for $x < 2$ and $x \ge 2$, we must evaluate the left hand limit and the right hand limit separately.

Left Hand Limit (LHL) as $x \to 2^-$:

When $x$ approaches 2 from the left side, we are considering values of $x$ that are less than 2 ($x < 2$). For $x < 2$, the function is defined by the rule $f(x) = x + 1$.

So, the LHL is given by:

$\lim\limits_{x \to 2^-} f(x) = \lim\limits_{x \to 2^-} (x + 1)$

Since $(x+1)$ is a polynomial function (which is continuous everywhere), we can evaluate this limit by direct substitution of $x=2$ into the expression:

LHL = $2 + 1 = 3$.

Right Hand Limit (RHL) as $x \to 2^+$:

When $x$ approaches 2 from the right side, we are considering values of $x$ that are greater than or equal to 2 ($x \ge 2$). For $x \ge 2$, the function is defined by the rule $f(x) = x^2 - 1$.

So, the RHL is given by:

$\lim\limits_{x \to 2^+} f(x) = \lim\limits_{x \to 2^+} (x^2 - 1)$

Since $(x^2 - 1)$ is also a polynomial function, we can evaluate this limit by direct substitution of $x=2$ into the expression:

RHL = $(2)^2 - 1 = 4 - 1 = 3$.

Existence of the Overall Limit:

We have found that the Left Hand Limit is 3 and the Right Hand Limit is 3.

LHL = $\lim\limits_{x \to 2^-} f(x) = 3$

RHL = $\lim\limits_{x \to 2^+} f(x) = 3$

Since the LHL and the RHL both exist and are equal to the same value (3), the overall limit $\lim\limits_{x \to 2} f(x)$ exists and is equal to 3.

$\lim\limits_{x \to 2} f(x) = 3$.



Existence of a Limit

For the overall limit of a function $f(x)$ as $x$ approaches a point $a$, denoted by $\lim\limits_{x \to a} f(x)$, to exist and have a finite value, the behavior of the function as $x$ approaches $a$ from the left must be the same as its behavior as $x$ approaches $a$ from the right. This requires the agreement of the one-sided limits.

Condition for the Existence of a Finite Limit

The limit of a function $f(x)$ as $x$ approaches $a$, $\lim\limits_{x \to a} f(x)$, exists and is equal to a finite value $L$ if and only if both the left hand limit (LHL) and the right hand limit (RHL) as $x$ approaches $a$ exist and are equal to that same finite value $L$.

Mathematically, this condition can be stated as:

$\lim\limits_{x \to a} f(x) = L$

exists and is finite

is true if and only if

$\lim\limits_{x \to a^-} f(x)$ exists and is finite,

... (i)

$\lim\limits_{x \to a^+} f(x)$ exists and is finite,

... (ii)

and

$\lim\limits_{x \to a^-} f(x) = \lim\limits_{x \to a^+} f(x) = L$

... (iii)

So, if conditions (i), (ii), and (iii) are all met, then the bilateral limit $\lim\limits_{x \to a} f(x)$ exists and is equal to $L$. Conversely, if the limit $\lim\limits_{x \to a} f(x)$ exists and is equal to $L$, it implies that both one-sided limits exist and are equal to $L$.

This fundamental theorem connects the two-sided limit to the one-sided limits and is crucial for evaluating limits of functions, especially piecewise-defined functions.


Cases Where the Limit Does Not Exist (DNE)

The limit $\lim\limits_{x \to a} f(x)$ does not exist (DNE) if the condition for existence (LHL = RHL = finite value) is not met. This can happen in several ways:

  1. The Left Hand Limit and the Right Hand Limit Exist but are Not Equal:

    If $\lim\limits_{x \to a^-} f(x) = L_1$ and $\lim\limits_{x \to a^+} f(x) = L_2$, but $L_1 \neq L_2$, then the limit $\lim\limits_{x \to a} f(x)$ does not exist. The function "jumps" at $x=a$.

    Graph showing LHL != RHL

    Example: Consider a piecewise function like $f(x) = \begin{cases} x+1 & \text{if } x < 0 \\ x-1 & \text{if } x \ge 0 \end{cases}$. As $x \to 0^-$, $f(x) \to 1$. As $x \to 0^+$, $f(x) \to -1$. Since $1 \neq -1$, $\lim\limits_{x \to 0} f(x)$ does not exist.

  2. One or Both One-Sided Limits are Unbounded:

    If $\lim\limits_{x \to a^-} f(x) = \pm \infty$ or $\lim\limits_{x \to a^+} f(x) = \pm \infty$ (or both), then the limit $\lim\limits_{x \to a} f(x)$ does not exist as a finite number. While we might describe the behavior by saying the limit is infinity, technically the limit does not exist in the sense of converging to a finite value $L$. This indicates a vertical asymptote at $x=a$.

    Graph showing unbounded limit (vertical asymptote)

    Example: Consider $f(x) = \frac{1}{x^2}$ as $x \to 0$. $\lim\limits_{x \to 0^-} \frac{1}{x^2} = +\infty$ and $\lim\limits_{x \to 0^+} \frac{1}{x^2} = $+\infty$. Even though both go to $+\infty$, the limit does not exist as a finite value. For $f(x) = \frac{1}{x}$ as $x \to 0$, $\lim\limits_{x \to 0^-} \frac{1}{x} = -\infty$ and $\lim\limits_{x \to 0^+} \frac{1}{x} = +\infty$. The limits are different and unbounded, so the overall limit does not exist.

  3. One or Both One-Sided Limits Do Not Exist Due to Oscillation:

    If the function values oscillate infinitely rapidly as $x$ approaches $a$ and do not approach any single value, then the limit does not exist. This is often the case for functions involving trigonometric expressions near points where their arguments become unbounded.

    Graph showing oscillating behavior near a point

    Example: Consider $f(x) = \sin\left(\frac{1}{x}\right)$ as $x \to 0$. As $x$ gets closer to 0, $\frac{1}{x}$ gets larger and larger (in magnitude), causing $\sin\left(\frac{1}{x}\right)$ to oscillate infinitely often between -1 and 1. The function values do not settle on a single value, so $\lim\limits_{x \to 0} \sin\left(\frac{1}{x}\right)$ does not exist.


Example 1. Does the limit $\lim\limits_{x \to 1} f(x)$ exist for the function $f(x) = \begin{cases} 2x + 1 & , & x \le 1 \\ 5 - x & , & x > 1 \end{cases}$?

Answer:

To determine if the limit $\lim\limits_{x \to 1} f(x)$ exists, we need to evaluate the left hand limit and the right hand limit at $x=1$ and compare them.

Left Hand Limit (LHL) as $x \to 1^-$:

When $x$ approaches 1 from the left side, we consider values of $x$ that are strictly less than 1 ($x < 1$). According to the definition of the function, for $x \le 1$, $f(x)$ is given by $2x + 1$.

So, we evaluate the limit using the expression $2x + 1$:

LHL = $\lim\limits_{x \to 1^-} f(x) = \lim\limits_{x \to 1^-} (2x + 1)$

Since $2x+1$ is a polynomial, we can use direct substitution:

LHL = $2(1) + 1 = 2 + 1 = 3$.

Right Hand Limit (RHL) as $x \to 1^+$:

When $x$ approaches 1 from the right side, we consider values of $x$ that are strictly greater than 1 ($x > 1$). According to the definition of the function, for $x > 1$, $f(x)$ is given by $5 - x$.

So, we evaluate the limit using the expression $5 - x$:

RHL = $\lim\limits_{x \to 1^+} f(x) = \lim\limits_{x \to 1^+} (5 - x)$

Since $5-x$ is a polynomial, we can use direct substitution:

RHL = $5 - 1 = 4$.

Comparison of LHL and RHL:

We found that the Left Hand Limit as $x \to 1$ is 3, and the Right Hand Limit as $x \to 1$ is 4.

LHL = 3

... (iv)

RHL = 4

... (v)

Since LHL $\neq$ RHL (specifically, $3 \neq 4$), the condition for the existence of the limit $\lim\limits_{x \to 1} f(x)$ is not met.

Therefore, the limit $\lim\limits_{x \to 1} f(x)$ does not exist.



Evaluation of Limits by Direct Substitution

The simplest and most straightforward method for evaluating limits is through direct substitution. This method relies on the property of continuity of the function at the point the variable is approaching. If a function is "well-behaved" at a certain point, its limit as the variable approaches that point is simply the value of the function at that point.

Principle of Direct Substitution

If a function $f(x)$ is continuous at $x = a$, then the limit of $f(x)$ as $x$ approaches $a$ is equal to the value of the function evaluated at $x=a$.

This can be stated formally as:

If $f$ is continuous at $a$, then $\lim\limits_{x \to a} f(x) = f(a)$.

Recall from the concept of limits and continuity that for a function to be continuous at $x=a$, it must satisfy three conditions: 1) $f(a)$ is defined, 2) $\lim\limits_{x \to a} f(x)$ exists, and 3) $\lim\limits_{x \to a} f(x) = f(a)$. The direct substitution method is essentially applying the third condition of continuity in reverse: if we know the function is continuous, we can use $f(a)$ to find the limit.

Functions for which Direct Substitution is Applicable

Direct substitution works for a wide range of functions at points within their domain where they are continuous. Many common types of functions are continuous on their entire domain or on specific intervals. These include:


Example 1. Evaluate $\lim\limits_{x \to 2} (3x^2 - 5x + 1)$.

Answer:

The function $f(x) = 3x^2 - 5x + 1$ is a polynomial function. Polynomials are continuous for all real numbers. Therefore, we can evaluate the limit by directly substituting the value $x=2$ into the function expression.

$\lim\limits_{x \to 2} (3x^2 - 5x + 1) = 3(2)^2 - 5(2) + 1$}

$= 3(4) - 10 + 1$}

$= 12 - 10 + 1$}

$= 2 + 1$}

$= 3$

The limit of the function as $x$ approaches 2 is 3.


Example 2. Evaluate $\lim\limits_{x \to 1} \frac{x^2 + 3}{x + 1}$.

Answer:

The function $f(x) = \frac{x^2 + 3}{x + 1}$ is a rational function. A rational function is continuous at all points where its denominator is not equal to zero.

We need to evaluate the limit as $x$ approaches 1. Let's check the value of the denominator at $x=1$:

Denominator at $x=1 = 1 + 1 = 2$.

Since the denominator is 2, which is non-zero, the function is continuous at $x=1$. Therefore, we can use direct substitution to evaluate the limit.

$\lim\limits_{x \to 1} \frac{x^2 + 3}{x + 1} = \frac{(1)^2 + 3}{1 + 1}$}

$= \frac{1 + 3}{2}$}

$= \frac{4}{2}$}

$= 2$

The limit of the function as $x$ approaches 1 is 2.



Methods for Evaluating Indeterminate Forms (Factorization, Rationalization)

As we saw with direct substitution, it is the simplest way to evaluate limits for many functions. However, direct substitution cannot be used when it results in an indeterminate form. The most common indeterminate form encountered initially is $\frac{0}{0}$. An indeterminate form means that the limit cannot be determined simply by looking at the form; it requires further analysis and manipulation of the expression. It does not necessarily mean the limit does not exist.

Indeterminate Form $\frac{0}{0}$

If, upon attempting direct substitution of $x=a$ into a rational expression $\frac{f(x)}{g(x)}$, we find that both the numerator $f(a)$ and the denominator $g(a)$ are equal to zero, then the expression is in the indeterminate form $\frac{0}{0}$ at $x=a$.

That is, if $\lim\limits_{x \to a} f(x) = 0$ and $\lim\limits_{x \to a} g(x) = 0$, then $\lim\limits_{x \to a} \frac{f(x)}{g(x)}$ is of the form $\frac{0}{0}$.

When we encounter this indeterminate form, it signifies that there is likely a common factor, often $(x-a)$, in both the numerator and the denominator that is causing both to be zero at $x=a$. By eliminating this common factor through algebraic techniques, we can simplify the expression and then evaluate the limit using direct substitution on the simplified form.

Two primary methods for dealing with the $\frac{0}{0}$ indeterminate form at an elementary level are Factorization and Rationalization.


1. Factorization Method

This method is most effective when the numerator and denominator are polynomial expressions that can be factored. The goal is to identify and cancel the common factor $(x-a)$ that leads to the $\frac{0}{0}$ form.

Steps for the Factorization Method:

  1. First, attempt direct substitution of $x=a$ into the expression $\frac{f(x)}{g(x)}$. Confirm that this results in the indeterminate form $\frac{0}{0}$. If it does not, direct substitution was the correct method, or the limit might be $\pm \infty$ or non-existent for other reasons (which factorization won't resolve).
  2. Factor the numerator $f(x)$ completely and factor the denominator $g(x)$ completely. Since $f(a)=0$ and $g(a)=0$, the Factor Theorem from algebra tells us that $(x-a)$ must be a factor of both $f(x)$ and $g(x)$.
  3. Cancel the common factor $(x-a)$ from the numerator and the denominator. This step is valid because when we are evaluating the limit as $x \to a$, we are considering values of $x$ that are very close to $a$ but are not equal to $a$. Therefore, the factor $(x-a)$ is non-zero, and division by a non-zero quantity is permissible.
  4. Once the common factor $(x-a)$ is cancelled, the simplified expression is equivalent to the original function for all $x \neq a$. Evaluate the limit of this simplified expression using direct substitution of $x=a$. This will give the value of the limit.

Example 1. Evaluate $\lim\limits_{x \to 3} \frac{x^2 - 9}{x - 3}$.

Answer:

Step 1: Check direct substitution.

Substitute $x=3$ into the numerator: $3^2 - 9 = 9 - 9 = 0$.

Substitute $x=3$ into the denominator: $3 - 3 = 0$.

Since we get $\frac{0}{0}$, this is an indeterminate form, and we need to use another method.

Step 2: Factor the numerator and denominator.

The numerator is a difference of squares: $x^2 - 9 = (x - 3)(x + 3)$.

The denominator is already in a simple form: $x - 3$.

The expression becomes: $\lim\limits_{x \to 3} \frac{(x - 3)(x + 3)}{x - 3}$

Step 3: Cancel the common factor.

We can see the common factor $(x - 3)$ in both the numerator and the denominator. Since we are evaluating the limit as $x \to 3$, $x \neq 3$, so $(x - 3) \neq 0$. Thus, we can cancel this factor:

$\lim\limits_{x \to 3} \frac{\cancel{(x - 3)}(x + 3)}{\cancel{x - 3}} = \lim\limits_{x \to 3} (x + 3)$

Step 4: Evaluate the limit of the simplified expression by direct substitution.

Now substitute $x=3$ into the simplified expression $(x + 3)$:

$\lim\limits_{x \to 3} (x + 3) = 3 + 3 = 6$.

The limit is 6.


2. Rationalization Method

This method is commonly used when the expression involves radicals (usually square roots) and direct substitution results in the $\frac{0}{0}$ indeterminate form. The process involves multiplying the numerator and denominator by the conjugate of the radical expression to eliminate the root, which then usually reveals a common factor that can be cancelled.

The key formula used here is the difference of squares: $(A - B)(A + B) = A^2 - B^2$.

Steps for the Rationalization Method:

  1. First, attempt direct substitution of $x=a$ into the expression $\frac{f(x)}{g(x)}$. Confirm that this results in the indeterminate form $\frac{0}{0}$.
  2. Identify the term(s) containing the radical(s). These are typically in the form $(\sqrt{A} \pm B)$ or $(A \pm \sqrt{B})$.
  3. Multiply both the numerator and the denominator by the conjugate of the radical term. The conjugate of $(\sqrt{A} - B)$ is $(\sqrt{A} + B)$, and the conjugate of $(\sqrt{A} + B)$ is $(\sqrt{A} - B)$. Similarly, the conjugate of $(A - \sqrt{B})$ is $(A + \sqrt{B})$, and the conjugate of $(A + \sqrt{B})$ is $(A - \sqrt{B})$.
  4. Simplify the numerator and denominator. Use the difference of squares formula $(u-v)(u+v) = u^2 - v^2$ on the part that was rationalized (e.g., $(\sqrt{A} - B)(\sqrt{A} + B) = (\sqrt{A})^2 - B^2 = A - B^2$). It is often beneficial NOT to fully expand the other part (the one that now contains the conjugate factor) initially, as a common factor is usually about to appear.
  5. After simplification, look for the common factor, which will often be $(x-a)$, that was causing the $\frac{0}{0}$ form. Cancel this common factor from the numerator and the denominator. This is valid because $x \neq a$.
  6. Evaluate the limit of the resulting simplified expression using direct substitution of $x=a$.

Example 2. Evaluate $\lim\limits_{x \to 0} \frac{\sqrt{x + 4} - 2}{x}$.

Answer:

Step 1: Check direct substitution.

Substitute $x=0$ into the numerator: $\sqrt{0 + 4} - 2 = \sqrt{4} - 2 = 2 - 2 = 0$.

Substitute $x=0$ into the denominator: $0$.

Since we get $\frac{0}{0}$, this is an indeterminate form, and we need to use another method.

Step 2: Identify the radical term and its conjugate.

The term involving the square root is in the numerator: $(\sqrt{x + 4} - 2)$.

The conjugate of $(\sqrt{x + 4} - 2)$ is $(\sqrt{x + 4} + 2)$.

Step 3: Multiply numerator and denominator by the conjugate.

We multiply both the numerator and the denominator by $(\sqrt{x + 4} + 2)$:

$\lim\limits_{x \to 0} \frac{\sqrt{x + 4} - 2}{x} \times \frac{\sqrt{x + 4} + 2}{\sqrt{x + 4} + 2}$

Step 4: Simplify the expression.

Use the difference of squares formula in the numerator:

$(\sqrt{x + 4} - 2)(\sqrt{x + 4} + 2) = (\sqrt{x + 4})^2 - (2)^2 = (x + 4) - 4 = x$.

Keep the denominator in factored form:

$x (\sqrt{x + 4} + 2)$

The expression becomes:

$\lim\limits_{x \to 0} \frac{x}{x (\sqrt{x + 4} + 2)}$

Step 5: Cancel the common factor.

We see the common factor $x$ in both the numerator and the denominator. Since we are evaluating the limit as $x \to 0$, $x \neq 0$. Thus, we can cancel the factor $x$:

$\lim\limits_{x \to 0} \frac{\cancel{x}}{\cancel{x} (\sqrt{x + 4} + 2)} = \lim\limits_{x \to 0} \frac{1}{\sqrt{x + 4} + 2}$

Step 6: Evaluate the limit of the simplified expression by direct substitution.

Now substitute $x=0$ into the simplified expression $\frac{1}{\sqrt{x + 4} + 2}$:

$\lim\limits_{x \to 0} \frac{1}{\sqrt{x + 4} + 2} = \frac{1}{\sqrt{0 + 4} + 2} = \frac{1}{\sqrt{4} + 2} = \frac{1}{2 + 2} = \frac{1}{4}$.

The limit is $\frac{1}{4}$.